Time warp with us back to 1986 one more time, to a fabulous creation by Alfa Romeo known as the GTV-6. This was essentially a hatchback version of the Alfetta sedan with a wonderful 2.5 Liter V6 swapped in from the Alfa 6. Think along the same lines as a half-price, much swoopier first-generation BMW M6, or a even an larger, upmarket Isuzu Impulse, and you’re getting close. The same thought process prevailed — a midsized touring car with good looks and an even better powerplant.
That engine is what really carries the impact of this car’s significance, even more so than the perfect weight distribution achieved by putting the transaxle in the rear. The resulting perfect handling is a true joy when piloting the GTV-6 down a twisting back road, but that engine note is beyond perfect. It’s sublime.
A couple countries’ distance away, Porsche looked at their 924, with its paltry 110 horsepower. Then they looked at the 944 parked right next to it, with it’s 928-V8-chopped-in-half engine featuring 144 horses. The higher pricing meant slow sales, something they could not afford to have, especially right after the 924 model had essentially bailed them out of the gas crisis. They looked back at the 924. Even with a turbo installed, something wasn’t quite right. The smoothness in regards to power output and driveability wasn’t really there. They looked at the 944 again, itself an evolution of the 924 platform and its direct replacement. Hey! Let’s take the 2.5 Liter from the 944 and dump it in the trimmer, lighter 924!
The result is quite an amazing niche car — the 924S. True, the existing 944 Turbo could leave it behind, say nothing of a 911. But for the briefest of moments, this was the best all-motor budget Porsche to be had: faster than a normal 944 due to less weight. Priced under $20K, it featured 150 horses, 25 more than the standard 924. Standstill to 60 could be had in under 8 seconds, and handling was a high point, with near-perfect weight distribution thanks to the rear-mounted transmission (are we sensing a pattern here?).
Today, this same car plus 60-70K miles can be had for less than six grand. You should be emptying your pockets at this point, and well on your way to the classifieds! Soon after, more powerful 944 models emerged, and by 1989 the 924S was no more, as Porsche began focusing on a more upmarket direction. If you can live with the rather plain, minimalist interior, this is your budget Porsche.
With the introduction of the Mark II Celica Supra in 1982, Toyota introduced a sweeping new design with popup headlights, and a rear sunshade meant to thumb its nose at the louvers of Nissan’s Z cars. Today, of course, the Supra is very reknowned amongst petrolheads thanks to the 1993-1998 Mark IV model and its seemingly indestructible engine — several tuners have extracted over 1000 horsepower from its hellish depths.
For those of us not looking for a 10-second quarter mile (and something more monetarily manageable), the 85-86 Celica Supra is a very good find. As the last years of its generation, the 2.8 Liter DOHC inline six was bumped to over 160 ponies, which enabled 60mph in less than 8.5 seconds. The rear spoiler was changed to a two-piece version, and Toyota added defogger-equipped side mirrors, factory theft-deterrent system, and auto-off lights with illuminated entry.
As with all 1982-1986 Celica Supras, you can choose from “Performance-Type” or “Luxury-Type”. Naturally, human nature would want those two combined, but there you are. Mechanically, there is no difference, but our choice in this case would be the “P-Type” with its fender flares, analog dash, limited slip diff, and optional leather interior and headlight washers. Prices range from $3K-$5K for examples in good shape, but you’ll be hard-pressed to find one under 100,000 miles. But with Japanese reliability, that normally isn’t a problem. Go Z hunting.
Subaru has always been just that little bit different. Much like the neighborhood kid who insisted on keeping to himself all the time and peering at you from behind the curtains as you walked past his house. Particularly in the 1970s and 80s, you got some of the funkiest designs and features from Subarus. Some called them “unique”, others were much less kind. The XT6 was one of the keepers.
From 1988-1991, Subaru’s wedge of cheese was stuffed with a 2.7-Liter Flat Six engine. The 145 horsepower eminating from within didn’t exactly scream “Porsche”, but it was much stronger and smoother than the turbocharged XT previously available. The suspension, which could be lowered and raised, was beefed up to support the heavier engine, and the power steering unit was upgraded to a unique variable-assist system that eliminated the standard power steering pump.
All this sounds halfway interesting, but in the end, it was a design exercise (along with its successor, the SVX) that never really did much in the way of advancing Subaru’s popularity. Gadgets abounded, such as headlight washers, steering wheel with a single vertical and a single horizontal spoke, pistol-grip shifter, and an instrument cluster that tilted with the steering wheel. Room inside is decent, trunk space isn’t bad, and when prompted, the cheese wedge can move down the road quite well (due in part to its extremely aerodynamic properties), emitting that distinctive flat-cylindered engine wobble. Some find it quite addictive. If you want to turn heads, plan on spending 3-4 grand on a good example with a manual shifter.
Mitsubishi has a reputation among us car nuts for making some great cars with hairdryers under the hood, cleverly disguised as turbochargers. Models such as the 3000GT, all the different Eclipse and Lancer Evolution variations, and the Galant VR-4 owe their existence to the 1982-1990 Starion. It featured a 2.6-Liter turbocharged engine and rear-wheel drive, and rowing the stick vigorously could get you from here to there with great aplomb. Opt for the widebody version, and it’s quite a looker too, with a more chunky appearance than most doorwedge shapes of the period. The aerodynamics were quite well-designed for the time period, and the resulting slippery-ness was responsible for the Starion’s reputation as one of the world’s fastest mass-produced cars.
Admittedly, this engine won’t respond to drastic tuning quite the same way the Eclipse/Evolution’s 2.0 Turbo would, for example, but there are modifications to be had in the way of chipping and turbo/intercooler/exhaust upgrading. And since many Starions (today around the $came with a limited-slip differential and anti-lock brakes, you can worry less about spinning off into a ditch and more about trying to stick with that 3-series that’s irritatingly quick through the bends. As with most 2+2 cars, rear passengers will need to be either circus midgets or pets. No pet giraffes, however.

















